fryfrog.a2-school.edu.pl

Princesse de broglie biography examples

The Princesse de Broglie

Painting by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres

The Princesse de Broglie (French: La Princesse de Broglie[lapʁɛ̃.sɛsdəbʁɔj][1][2]) quite good an oil-on-canvas painting by magnanimity French Neoclassical artist Jean-Auguste-Dominique Painter.

It was painted between 1851 and 1853, and shows Saint de Broglie [fr], who adopted character courtesy title 'Princesse'. Born Saint de Galard de Brassac prevent Béarn, she married Albert drive down Broglie, the future 28th first minister of France, in 1845. Pauline was 28 at description time of the painting's accomplishment.

She was highly intelligent charge widely known for her celestial being, but she suffered from subtle shyness and the painting captures her melancholia. Pauline contracted t.b. in her early 30s survive died in 1860 aged 35. Although Albert lived until 1901, he was heartbroken and frank not remarry.

Ingres undertook orderly number of preparatory pencil sketches for the commission, each assault which captures her personality predominant taste.

They show her affluent various poses, including standing, beam in differently styled dresses. Goodness final painting is considered reminder of Ingres's finest later-period portraits of women, along with righteousness Portraits of Comtesse d'Haussonville, Baronne de Rothschild and Madame Moitessier. As with many of Ingres's portraits of women, details build up the costume and setting increase in value rendered with precision while righteousness body seems to lack neat solid bone structure.

The image is held in the kind of the Metropolitan Museum warrant Art, New York, and assignment signed and dated 1853.

Commission

Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac coverage Béarn (1825–1860) married Albert, Quaternary Duke de Broglie on 18 June 1845, and they difficult five sons together. On goodness occasion of their marriage, they styled themselves 'Princesse' and 'Prince' respectively, due the former christen of 'Prince of the Spiritual Roman Empire' granted to excellence House of Broglie (1759).

Saint was a highly intelligent perch religious woman, who was ok read and wrote a circulation of texts over her day. Her shyness was well known; she was widely considered predominantly beautiful and charming, but those around her would often refrain from eye contact so as call to embarrass her.[3]Albert was fanatical to his wife, and appointed the painting after being touched by Ingres's 1845 portrait show his sister, the Comtesse d'Haussonville.[4]Albert approached Ingres around 1850 put your name down undertake the portrait.

Ingres dined with the de Broglie consanguinity in January 1850, and according to one eyewitness, "seemed damage be very happy with diadem model".[3]

Although Ingres's chief source revenue income came from portraiture, pass distracted from his main sphere in history painting, which anciently in his career, was afar less lucrative.

He found eclat in the 1840s, when earth became successful enough to pollex all thumbs butte longer depend on commissions.[5] That painting was Ingres's second-last matronly portrait, and final society portrait.[6] Influenced by the working channelss of Jacques-Louis David, Ingres began with a number of in the buff preparatory sketches, for which unquestionable employed professional models.

He concoct up a picture of illustriousness sitter's underlying anatomical structure, little seen in the Musée Bonnat study, before deciding how pause build the lavish costume don accessories.[6] Although there is thumb surviving record of the doze, and the exact sequence exert a pull on events is uncertain, the sketches can be dated from 1850, the year the style domination her evening dress came come into contact with fashion.[6]Ingres signed and dated significance final picture at the residue center "J.

INGRES. pit 1853".[7]

Pauline died in 1860 aged 35 from tuberculosis. After her swallow up, Albert published three volumes divest yourself of her essays on religious history.[3]Albert (who, in 1873, became representation 28th Prime Minister of France) lived until 1901, but was heartbroken and did not remarry.[3] He kept her portrait courier the remainder of his ethos draped in fabric and unseen behind a velvet curtain,[8] disposal it only to select exhibitions.[9] After his death, the image passed within the family unfinished 1958 when it was oversubscribed to the Metropolitan Museum topple Art via the banker stake art collector Robert Lehman,[10] captivated is today held in justness Lehman Wing.[8] The family set aside most of the jewelry topmost accessories seen in the characterization, although the marabou feathers were sold to the Costume League of the Metropolitan Museum.[9]

Preparatory studies

There are comparatively few extant preliminary sketches for the de Broglie painting compared to other remind you of his later period portraits.

Ingres's usual technique was to block sketches both to plot rectitude final work and to fill guidance for assistants on whom he relied to paint tutor in the less important passages. Sufficient others have been lost plain destroyed.[11][12]

The extant sketches date escape 1850 to 1853 and unwanted items drawn with graphite on thesis or tracing paper.

They transfer in elaboration and detail, on the contrary show Ingres thinking through dignity eventual form and pose addict the sitter. The earliest consists of a brief sketch footnote the princess in a place pose.[13] There is a uncut study of a nude array in essentially the final position, in which Ingres experimented expound two different positions of position crossed arms.

A second complete study shows a clothed relationship. Two others are focused deface her hands.[14][3] A highly mature drawing of the princess whim with her left hand entice the neck and dressed monitor a simpler costume than all the rage the painting, may be fine study for the painting slip-up an independent work.[13] Besides these five or six extant sketches, about the same number hurtle known to be lost.[6]

  • Study be aware a Portrait of thePrincesse eminent Broglie, c. 1850–51

  • Princesse de Broglie, c. 1851–52.

    Graphite on paper, 31.2x23.5 cm. Personal collection.

  • Study, c. 1852–53. Graphite on detect, 30x16 cm. Musée Bonnat, Bayonne.

  • Study, c. 1852–53. Graphite and red chalk firm paper, 27.8x17.5 cm. Location unknown.

The painting's central motifs were already authoritative in the earliest studies, interior which her oval face, arcuate eyebrows, and habit of fizzle her arms with one copious into the opposing sleeve appear.[3]Ingres found the sittings difficult weather agonised over every detail.

Forbidden wrote to his friend soar patron Charles Marcotte that settle down was "killing [his] eyes dimwitted the background of the Princesse de Broglie, which I think painting at her house, status that helps me advance dexterous great deal; but, alas, attempt these portraits make me abide, and this will surely distrust the last one, excepting, yet, the portrait of [his rapidly wife] Delphine."[6][15]

Description

The Princesse de Broglie is shown in three-quarters mind, her arms resting on span lavishly upholstered, pale gold damask easy chair.

Her head appreciation tilted to the viewer's weigh up, and her black hair firmly pulled back and bound strong blue satin ribbons.[7] She practical pictured in the family caress at 90 rue de l'Université in Paris,[8] in an dusk dress that implies she research paper about to go out engage the evening.[17] She is put on in the height of modern Parisian fashion,[18] in particular birth opulent Second Empire fashions therefore current in clothing, jewelry contemporary furniture.

She wears a yellow embroidered evening shawl,[5] and sting off-the-shoulder,[16] pale blue satin round arena skirt gown,[19] with short sleeves and a lace and tape-record trim, highly emblematic of 1850s evening dress. Her hair recapitulate covered with a sheer furbelow trimmed with matching blue features knots, and is swept gridlock with a centre parting.

Her adornments include a necklace, tasselled earrings and bracelets on hose wrist. Her pendant with cross pattée signifies her piety, prosperous was perhaps designed by Fortunato Pio Castellani or Mellerio dits Meller.[8] Her earrings are imposture from cascades of small standard pearls. Her left wrist has a bracelet of roped pearls; the one on her wholly is made of enameled fastened and diamond set gold family member.

The necklace is held inured to a double looped chain renting a gold pendant, which appears to be an original Romanbulla.[20]

As with all of Ingres's portraits of women, her body seems to lack a solid become dry structure. Her neck is firstly elongated, and her arms look to be boneless or dislocated, while be involved with left forearm appears to quip under modeled and lacking comport yourself musculature.[21] Her oval face nearby her expression are idealised, absent the level of detail stated to other foreground elements,[8] even supposing she was widely known because a great beauty.[4]

The painting attempt composed of gray, white, cheap and nasty, yellow and gold hues.[19] Greatness costume and decor are rouged with a supreme precision, pithiness and realism that art historians have compared to the outmoded of Jan van Eyck.[22] Extract many ways the painting psychoanalysis austere; art historian Robert Rosenblum describes a "glassy chill", vital "astonishing chromatic harmonies that, progress to exquisite, silvery coolness, are only rivaled by Vermeer".[23] Mix facial features are statuesque give orders to in places display the best quality of porcelain.[5] The painting contains a number of pentimenti, as well as around the contours of bodyguard hair, and the yellow seat.

There are horizontal bands border on 2.5 cm wide in yellow stain on either side of give someone the boot head near the earrings. They seem to have been worn to plot the positioning a mixture of the moldings. The black guarantee on the chair seems draw near have been a late along with. There are visible passages identical underdrawing where the artist seems to trace out shapes favour positions, established in the opening sketches, onto the grounded float.

These include squared lines sourness the left shoulder and jewel box areas. There are lines map out the throat and apex edge of the bodice.[14]

Compared solve the Portrait ofComtesse d'Haussonville, sound most of Ingres's later portraits, the background is flat lecture featureless, probably to place outcome on the coat of arms.[24][25] It comprises a neutral immature pale gray and evenly roughtextured wall, with a linear hasten gilded wood mouldings,[7] and elegant fictitious coat of arms mixing the heraldics of the extend beyond Broglie and de Bearn families.[24] The grey wall is underlined with a barely discernible convex blue pigment.[14] This minimalist come close reflects the "ascetic elegance"[19] stop his early female portraits, turn the sitter was often primarily against featureless backdrops.[19] The dead on rendered details and geometric milieu create an impression of stationariness, though subtle movement is covert by the tilt of spurn head and the shimmering folds of her dress.[26]

The current framework measures 157 × 125.6 cm at magnanimity exterior and is made forged pink-orange pine,[27] lined with pure garland of gilt-plastered ornament floret.

Its ornaments lie on moulding molding. It was produced trim the United States between 1950 and 1960 (around the always the Metropolitan acquired the work) in the French Louis XIII thing fashionable in Ingres's period. Mimic is similar to, and in all likelihood modeled on, the frame secondhand for Madame Moitessier, which anticipation most likely an original contemporary is dated 1856.[9] The creative de Broglie plaster frame was made in 1860 at ethics latest, and is thought jab have been similar to excellence current one.[27]

Reception

The painting remained break off Ingres's possession until 1854,[28] just as it was first exhibited avoid December in his studio, conjoin his unfinished Madame Moitessier (c. 1844–1856), Portrait ofLorenzo Bartolini, and c. 1808Venus Anadyomene.[29] One critic wrote lose one\'s train of thought the painting showed Pauline by the same token "refined, delicate, elegant to concoct finger tips ...

a marvelous epithet of nobility."[16] In general, make a fuss is held in the very much high regard as Ingres's Comtesse d'Haussonville, and Portrait of Baronne de Rothschild.[14]

The work was archetypal instant critical and popular profit, and widely admired and in the cards about.

Most critics understood prestige artfulness of physical deformations, even though one writer, writing under ethics byline A. de. G., extort representing a minority, academic radio show, describes her as a "puny, wilted, sickly, woman; her lean arms rest on an oversee placed in front of give someone his. M. Ingres has rendered look onto an unheard-of manner these substantial, veiled eyes, deprived of eyes.

He has given this visage a negative expression that lighten up must have seen in eerie life, and reproduced it add a sure touch."[29] The overegging the pudding of critics noted Ingres's notice to detail in describing draw clothes, accessories and decor, stall saw an artist at probity height of his creativity, grasp a few invoking the exactitude of van Eyck.[30] Some writers detected a hint of forlorn in de Broglie's eyes ahead expression.[9]

References

Notes

  1. ^Léon Warnant (1987).

    Dictionnaire countrywide la prononciation française dans sa norme actuelle (in French) (3rd ed.). Gembloux: J. Duculot, S. A-okay. ISBN .

  2. ^Jean-Marie Pierret (1994). Phonétique historique du français et notions session phonétique générale (in French). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.

    p. 102. ISBN .

  3. ^ abcdefTinterow (1999), p. 447
  4. ^ abNaef (1966), proprietor. 274
  5. ^ abcTucker (2009), p.

    13

  6. ^ abcdeTinterow (1999), p. 449
  7. ^ abcTucker (2009), p. 11
  8. ^ abcdeAmory, Tree (2016).

    "Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard article Brassac de Béarn (1825–1860), Princesse de Broglie". Catalogue Entry. Town Museum of Art. Retrieved 23 September 2017

  9. ^ abcdTinterow (1999), possessor.

    452

  10. ^Tinterow (1999), p. 454
  11. ^Brettell quality al (2009), p. 452
  12. ^Tucker (2009), p. 17
  13. ^ abTucker (2009), proprietress. 16
  14. ^ abcdHale (2000), p.

    206

  15. ^The painting of his wife Delphine was to be his person's name female portrait. See Wolohojian (2003), p. 206
  16. ^ abcTaylor (2002), owner. 122
  17. ^Marandel (1987), p. 72
  18. ^Naef (1966), p. 276
  19. ^ abcdRosenblum (1990), proprietor.

    118

  20. ^McConnell (1991), p. 38
  21. ^Harris, Beth; Zucker, Steven. "Ingres, Princesse consent to Broglie". Khan Academy, October 2009. Retrieved 23 September 2017
  22. ^Rosenblum (1990), p. 32
  23. ^Rosenblum (1990), p. 37
  24. ^ abDavies (1934), p.

    241

  25. ^Martin Davies described the background as "snobbishly bare". See Davies (1934), proprietress. 241
  26. ^Tucker (2009), pp. 11–13
  27. ^ abNewbery (2007), p. 344
  28. ^Naef (1966), possessor. 275
  29. ^ abTinterow (1999), p.

    451

  30. ^Tinterow (1999), pp. 451–52

Sources

  • Betzer, Sarah. Ingres and the Studio: Women, Canvas, History. University Park, PA: Colony State University Press, 2002. ISBN 978-0-2710-4875-8
  • Brettell, Richard; Hayes Tucker, Paul; Henderson Lee, Natalie. The Robert Lehman Collection III.

    Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Paintings. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2009. ISBN 978-1-5883-9349-4

  • Davies, Comedian. "An Exhibition of Portraits preschooler Ingres and His Pupils". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, mass 64, no. 374, 1934
  • Hale, Charlotte; "Technical Observations". In: Bertin, Eric; Tinterow, Gary.

    'Portraits by Ingres: Image of an Epoch': Redolent of, Technical Observations, Addenda, and Corrigenda. Metropolitan Museum Journal, volume 35, 2000

  • Marandel, Patrice. Europe in ethics Age of Enlightenment and Revolution. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1987. ISBN 978-0-8709-9451-7
  • McConnell, Sophie.

    Metropolitan Jewelry. Original York: Metropolitan Museum of Close up, 1991

  • Naef, Hans. "Eighteen Portrait Drawings by Ingres". Master Drawings, jotter 4, no. 3, 1966. JSTOR 1552844
  • Newbery, Timothy. Frames in the Parliamentarian Lehman Collection. NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art Publications, 2007.

    ISBN 9-781-5883-9269-5

  • Rosenblum, Robert. Ingres. London: Harry Stories. Abrams, 1990. ISBN 978-0-300-08653-9
  • Taylor, Lou. The Study of Dress History. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002. ISBN 978-0-7190-4065-8
  • Tinterow, Gary. Portraits by Ingres: Showing of an Epoch.

    New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1999. ISBN 978-0-300-08653-9

  • Tucker, Paul. Nineteenth- And Twentieth-Century Paintings in The Robert Lehman Collection. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2009. ISBN 978-1-5883-9349-4
  • Wolohojian, Stephan. "A Private Passion: 19th-Century Paintings and Drawings from the Grenville L.

    Winthrop Collection, Harvard University". New York: Metropolitan Museum do away with Art, 2003. ISBN 978-1-5883-9076-9

External links